Have you ever wondered what happens when personal moments become public matters, especially when legal issues are involved? It's a rather common occurrence, actually. The story of Mihee Lucia Choe offers a glimpse into just such a situation, bringing to light some important aspects of public interaction and the legal process. Her name has appeared in recent news, particularly concerning a lawsuit and an earlier incident, which, you know, makes her story quite compelling for many people who are curious about these kinds of things. This article aims to lay out the known facts about Mihee Lucia Choe, drawing directly from public information, so we can all get a clearer picture of what has been reported.
For anyone who has followed local news or, you know, just happens to be interested in how legal cases develop, Mihee Lucia Choe’s situation presents a real-world example. It shows how specific actions can lead to legal consequences and how individuals might then seek legal recourse themselves. Her journey, as documented in public records, involves both a personal encounter with law enforcement and a subsequent formal complaint in the court system. It's a pretty clear illustration of how events can unfold in the public eye, affecting people's lives in significant ways.
What we'll explore here is not just the details of a particular case, but also, in a way, the broader implications for individuals when they find themselves in similar circumstances. We'll touch upon the known facts about Mihee Lucia Choe, her background, and the specific incidents that have brought her into the public conversation. It’s important to understand these details as they are reported, providing a factual basis for anyone trying to piece together the narrative. So, let's take a closer look at what the records tell us about Mihee Lucia Choe and the events surrounding her.
Table of Contents
- Who Is Mihee Lucia Choe?
- The Incident: A Difficult Lesson Learned
- The Legal Battle Unfolds
- Understanding Public Interactions and Legal Rights
- The Broader Picture: Public Records and Personal Stories
- Frequently Asked Questions About Mihee Lucia Choe
Who Is Mihee Lucia Choe?
Mihee Lucia Choe is a Glenview resident whose name has recently come up in public discussions due to legal proceedings. She is, as a matter of fact, 35 years old and lives on the 1600 block of Independence Avenue in Glenview. Beyond the legal details, some public information suggests she has been involved in creative projects. It's interesting how different parts of a person's life can, you know, become known through various public records and reports.
Her connection to the entertainment world, though limited in the available information, adds another layer to her public identity. Mihee Lucia Choe is, in some respects, recognized for her involvement in a couple of film projects. These include "what it was," released in 2014, and "the destined king," which came out in 2016. These details, while not directly related to the legal situation, help to paint a fuller picture of who Mihee Lucia Choe is beyond the headlines. It's, like, a piece of her story that many might not know.
Personal Details & Known Information
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Full Name | Mihee Lucia Choe |
| Age | 35 |
| Residence | Glenview, Illinois |
| Address (Block) | 1600 block of Independence Avenue |
| Known For (Film) | "what it was" (2014), "the destined king" (2016) |
| Role in Lawsuit | Plaintiff |
| Legal Representation | Attorney Matthew Wawrzyn |
The Incident: A Difficult Lesson Learned
The events leading to Mihee Lucia Choe's legal situation began with an interaction involving law enforcement. It was, apparently, a rather tough lesson for her to learn. The core of the incident involved a police officer telling her not to cause a disturbance. What happened next, according to reports, was that she shoved the officer. This action, as you can imagine, is typically a quick way to find yourself in handcuffs, and that's precisely what occurred in her case. It’s a moment that, you know, underscores the importance of how people interact with authority figures.
Following this encounter, Mihee Lucia Choe was, in fact, arrested. The time of her arrest was reported as 3:20. She faced several serious accusations stemming from this incident. These included two counts of battery, which is essentially making unwanted physical contact with another person. Additionally, she was accused of resisting arrest, which means actively opposing a lawful detention by a police officer. There was also a charge of obstructing identification, suggesting an issue with providing her identity when requested. These charges, basically, detail the gravity of the situation she found herself in.
The incident itself, as reported, serves as a stark reminder about the boundaries and expectations when interacting with police officers. It highlights how quickly a situation can escalate if certain instructions are not followed. Mihee Lucia Choe's experience, in a way, became a public example of the consequences that can arise from such encounters. The details of her arrest and the charges she faced are, you know, a key part of her story as it has been publicly shared.
The Legal Battle Unfolds
The story of Mihee Lucia Choe didn't end with her arrest; it actually moved into the court system. On March 20, a lawsuit was filed on her behalf by attorney Matthew Wawrzyn. This legal action named two specific individuals as defendants: Commander Anthony Addante and Patrol Officer Quinten Jedd. The filing of this suit, as first reported in the May 17 Journal & Topics, marked a significant turn in the public narrative surrounding Mihee Lucia Choe. It showed her taking a proactive step to address the earlier incident through legal means, which is, you know, a very common path for people in similar situations.
The legal process, as it often does, then began to unfold with various procedural steps. One notable development was the defendants' motion for an extension of time. This request, which sought more time to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint, was granted by the court. This particular decision, recorded as "Filing 10 minute entry before the Honorable Sara L," indicates the initial stages of the legal back-and-forth. It’s a typical part of how lawsuits progress, allowing all parties sufficient time to prepare their responses and arguments, so, it's pretty standard.
Further demonstrating the progress of the lawsuit, an affidavit of service was filed by Mihee Lucia Choe, the plaintiff. This document confirmed that the complaint and summonses had been properly delivered to the defendants, Mount Prospect (presumably referring to the Mount Prospect Police Department or municipality, though the text only names individuals as defendants), and Anthony Addante, on May 5, 2023. This step is, you know, absolutely vital in any legal case, ensuring that all involved parties are officially notified of the legal action against them. The entire sequence of events, from the initial incident to the filing of the lawsuit and its early procedural motions, paints a detailed picture of Mihee Lucia Choe's engagement with the legal system.
Understanding Public Interactions and Legal Rights
Mihee Lucia Choe's experience brings to the forefront some important points about how individuals interact with law enforcement and, in a way, their legal rights during such encounters. When a police officer issues an instruction, like asking someone not to cause a disturbance, it’s generally understood that cooperation can prevent further issues. The situation involving Mihee Lucia Choe, where a physical act like shoving occurred, illustrates how quickly a non-compliance can escalate into criminal charges. It's a very clear example of actions having immediate consequences, and, you know, it happens more often than people might think.
The charges she faced—battery, resisting arrest, and obstructing identification—are common in situations where individuals are perceived to be uncooperative or aggressive during police interactions. These types of accusations can have serious legal ramifications, impacting a person's record and future. Understanding what constitutes resisting arrest or obstructing identification is, therefore, pretty important for anyone. It's about knowing the boundaries and what is expected of citizens when approached by officers. People, basically, need to be aware of these things.
Moreover, the subsequent lawsuit filed by Mihee Lucia Choe against the officers highlights the right of individuals to seek legal recourse if they believe their rights were violated or if they experienced harm. This legal avenue allows for a formal review of the incident from a different perspective, with the court examining the actions of both the individual and the officers involved. It’s a fundamental part of the justice system, providing a mechanism for accountability and resolution. So, while the initial incident might have been difficult, the lawsuit represents a different kind of engagement with the legal system, seeking, you know, some form of justice or clarification.
It's worth noting that legal processes can be quite lengthy and involve many steps, as seen with the granted extension for the defendants to respond. This patient unfolding of events is typical of civil litigation, where facts are gathered, arguments are prepared, and evidence is presented. For anyone interested in the workings of the legal system, Mihee Lucia Choe's case, as publicly reported, provides a tangible example of these procedures in action. Learning more about legal processes can help clarify these aspects. It's a complex system, but, you know, it has its own rhythm.
For individuals, knowing their rights and responsibilities during encounters with law enforcement is, arguably, a very important aspect of civic life. While the specifics of Mihee Lucia Choe's case are unique to her, the underlying principles of public interaction and legal recourse are universal. It serves as a reminder that understanding these dynamics can be incredibly beneficial. You can, for instance, learn more about your rights during police encounters to be better prepared. It's all about, basically, being informed.
The Broader Picture: Public Records and Personal Stories
The story of Mihee Lucia Choe, as pieced together from public records, offers a compelling look at how personal events can become part of the public domain. Every time a lawsuit is filed, or an arrest is made, details become accessible to the public, creating a narrative that can be followed by anyone interested. This availability of information, you know, allows for transparency in the legal system and for communities to stay informed about events affecting their residents. It's a core part of how our society operates, really.
For someone like Mihee Lucia Choe, whose life includes both public legal battles and creative endeavors in film, the public record paints a multifaceted picture. It shows that individuals are rarely defined by just one incident or one aspect of their lives. Her story, in a way, highlights the human element behind court filings and news reports. It reminds us that behind every legal document, there's a person with a unique background and, you know, a personal journey.
The fact that Mihee Lucia Choe is known for her work in films like "what it was" and "the destined king" adds another dimension to her public profile. It shows that people can have diverse interests and pursuits, even while navigating challenging personal or legal situations. This blend of public legal matters and creative contributions is, perhaps, what makes her story particularly interesting to some. It's a reminder that, basically, life is full of different experiences for everyone.
Keeping up with public records and news reports can provide valuable insights into the workings of local justice systems and the lives of people within a community. Mihee Lucia Choe’s case is one example among many that illustrate these dynamics. It’s a chance to see how legal processes unfold and how individuals engage with them. So, for those who follow these kinds of stories, it offers a real-world look at how things happen. For more general information on legal proceedings, you might find resources from the United States Courts helpful.
Frequently Asked Questions About Mihee Lucia Choe
Who is Mihee Lucia Choe?
Mihee Lucia Choe is a Glenview resident, 35 years old, who has been involved in a public legal case. She is known for filing a lawsuit against Commander Anthony Addante and Patrol Officer Quinten Jedd. Additionally, she has credits in two films: "what it was" (2014) and "the destined king" (2016). So, she has a public presence both in legal matters and, you know, in the creative arts.
What was the lawsuit involving Mihee Lucia Choe about?
The lawsuit was filed by Mihee Lucia Choe on March 20, through her attorney Matthew Wawrzyn, against Commander Anthony Addante and Patrol Officer Quinten Jedd. It stemmed from an earlier incident where Mihee Lucia Choe was arrested after allegedly shoving a police officer who had told her not to cause a disturbance. She faced charges including two counts of battery, resisting arrest, and obstructing identification. The lawsuit, basically, represents her legal action concerning that incident, seeking, you know, some form of resolution or accountability.
What movies was Mihee Lucia Choe in?
According to available public information, Mihee Lucia Choe is known for her involvement in two film projects. These include "what it was," which was released in 2014, and "the destined king," which came out in 2016. These are the only film credits specifically mentioned in the provided text, so, you know, that's what we have to go on.
.png/revision/latest?cb=20210917155030)
